AOA Critical Issues Symposium: Advancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Orthopaedic Surgery.

ABSTRACT: In recent years, the medical field has recognized the pivotal role of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in enhancing patient care and addressing health-care disparities. Orthopaedic surgery has embraced these principles to create a more inclusive and representative workforce. A DEI symposium that was sponsored by the American Orthopaedic Association convened orthopaedic surgeons, researchers, educators, and stakeholders to discuss challenges and strategies for implementing DEI initiatives. The symposium emphasized the importance of equity, and fostered conversations on creating equal opportunities and resources. Speakers covered key topics, including establishing DEI divisions, metrics for success, DEI leadership, and available resources, and promoted excellence and innovation in orthopaedic surgery through a more diverse and inclusive approach.

A Comprehensive Review of Bone Health in a Child: From Birth to Adulthood.

Bone health is critical for growth and development during childhood. Although fractures are common in children, fractures occurring in the absence of trauma should prompt physicians to consider underlying bone health disorders. This article provides an overview of the current definition of osteoporosis in children, highlighting its limitations and the potential for underdiagnosis. It also discusses the timing of screening initiation and various techniques used to assess bone health, along with their respective benefits and limitations. In addition, this article identifies several causes of primary and secondary osteoporosis in children, shedding light on previously overlooked disorders that can contribute to poor bone quality. The article emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to therapeutic management and aims to optimize patient outcomes and improve the overall care of pediatric bone health disorders.

From Hip Screening to Hip Surveillance: Transforming Care for Patients With Cerebral Palsy: An Analysis of a Single Institution.

INTRODUCTION: Surveillance programs aimed at monitoring hip displacement in patients with cerebral palsy have been demonstrated to decrease the incidence of hip dislocations and properly time surgical intervention, ultimately improving patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine whether the implementation of a hip screening to surveillance program at a tertiary academic teaching hospital in 2017 increased the frequency of radiographic evaluations and changed the timing of surgical intervention. METHODS: A total of 592 patients with cerebral palsy were identified, and 468 of these patients had initial radiograph date data available. In this analysis, 246 patients with initial radiograph dates after 2012 were included. The study population was divided into two groups based on the initial radiograph date, 2012 to 2016 versus 2017 to 2022. One hundred sixty patients (65%) were in the 2012 to 2016 group, and 86 (35%) were in the 2017 to 2022 group. Statistical analysis was conducted using various techniques, such as two-sample Student t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi square/Fisher exact test, and multivariable linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The average number of radiographs per year in the 2017 to 2022 group was 0.11 (95% CI: 0.02, 0.20, P = 0.017) higher than the 2012 to 2016 group. After adjusting for confounders using multivariable linear regression analysis, this difference was even larger (difference 0.16, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.25, P = 0.001). The surgical intervention rate was significantly lower in the 2017 to 2022 group compared with the 2012 to 2016 group (12.9% versus 40.6%, P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: The results of this study suggest that the implementation of a hip screening to surveillance program results in more frequent radiographic evaluations and possibly a reduced need for surgical intervention from 2017 to 2022. In the 2012 to 2016 group, more surgical interventions were performed likely because of the lack of any hip surveillance or screening program in place.

AOA Critical Issues: Perceptions on the State of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Survey of the AOA Membership.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgery continues to trail other specialties in increasing diversity among its physician workforce. Various efforts have been and are currently being made to not only increase diversity, but also promote equity and inclusion in the field. The purpose of this study was to survey members of the American Orthopaedic Association (AOA) to determine how leaders in orthopaedics view diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) at the present time and to understand their perspective while moving into the future. METHODS: An anonymous 11-question survey was disseminated online to AOA members in May 2022. These individuals were identified by the AOA membership directory and the email ListServe. The survey included free-response and multiple-choice questions. Demographic information was self-identified, and both qualitative and quantitative data were collected. RESULTS: Of the 1,657 AOA members who were provided the survey, 262 (15.8%) responded. Approximately 29.5% (77) and 45.6% (119) of the surveyed population ranked "retention of underrepresented populations in orthopaedic residency (women, URiM)" as "very important" or "absolutely essential," respectively. The answers to the free-response questions identified multiple core themes that responders were passionate about, namely resident and attending physician recruitment and retention, as well as resident selection. CONCLUSIONS: Leaders in the field of orthopaedic surgery desire for action to be taken in the field of DEI. The findings of this survey denote positive attitudes even though many inequalities still pervade the field of orthopaedics. Through mentorship, objective evaluation, transparency, and continued intentional action, orthopaedic surgery is well-positioned to continue to move forward with DEI.

Male Versus Female Authorship in Flagship Pediatric Orthopaedic Journals From 2002 to 2021.

BACKGROUND: The evolution of female authorship in orthopaedic journals is reportedly rising, however, trends in pediatric orthopaedic publications have not been specifically studied, despite a higher proportion of female pediatric orthopaedic surgeons compared with orthopaedics at large. This study aimed to investigate trends in female first and senior authorship in 3 flagship pediatric orthopaedic journals over the past 20 years. METHODS: All manuscripts from the "Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Part B, and Journal of Children's Orthopaedics" from 2002 to 2021 were evaluated from Ovid MEDLINE, and the data were extracted. We utilized the sex "Application Program Interface" algorithm to determine the sex of the first and senior authors. χ 2 tests were used to analyze the demographics of the first and senior author cohorts. Fisher exact test was used to assess the trends in male and female authorship, controlling for year and journal. RESULTS: Of a total, 5499 individual first authors and 5794 senior authors were identified. Sex was determined for 83.5% of the authors. Female first authorship increased significantly from 2002 to 2021 (8.8% to 22.4%, P < 0.001), with women being more likely to publish as first authors in more recent years in each journal ( P < 0.001). Female senior authorship did not increase significantly over the same time period (10.8% to 12.8%, P = 0.238). There was significantly more male than female first and senior authors for all journals ( P <0.001 for both first and senior authors). CONCLUSIONS: While female first authorship in prominent pediatric orthopaedic journals has increased significantly from 2002 to 2021, senior authorship has remained stagnant. In addition, female pediatric orthopaedic surgeons publish at rates lower than their prevalence in the field. This study serves as a benchmark for future studies looking at sex and authorship in hopes of better understanding the underlying complex issues. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Racial disparities in readmission rates following surgical treatment of pediatric developmental dysplasia of the hip.

PURPOSE: Across orthopedic subspecialties, significant racial disparities have been identified with regard to postoperative outcomes. Despite these findings among adult patients, the literature assessing these disparities within pediatric orthopedics is limited. The purpose of this study was to determine the independent predictors for unplanned readmission following surgical treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. METHODS: Pediatric patients undergoing hip dysplasia surgery from 2012 to 2019 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database. Two patient groups were defined: patients who had unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days of surgery and patients who were not readmitted. Clinical characteristics assessed included gender, race, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class. Risk factors for complications were assessed using bivariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of 6561 pediatric patients undergoing surgical treatment for hip dysplasia, 540 (8.2%) had unplanned readmission. On bivariate analysis, non-white race (Black, Asian, Hispanic, American Indian, and Native Hawaiian), an ASA class of III, IV, or V, pulmonary, renal, neurological, and gastrointestinal comorbidities, as well as immune disease, steroid use, and nutritional support were significantly associated with unplanned readmission (p < 0.05 for all). After controlling for confounding variables on multivariate analysis, non-white race (OR 1.46; p = 0.042) and ASA class of III-V (OR 2.21; p = 0.002) were found to be independent predictors for readmission. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be advised of the increased readmission rates observed in non-white patients and those of higher ASA scores. Further work is needed to combat existing disparities within pediatric orthopedics.

Impact of COVID-19 on Spinal Diagnosis and Procedural Volume in the United States.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a national database. OBJECTIVES: COVID-19 resulted in the widespread shifting of hospital resources to handle surging COVID-19 cases resulting in the postponement of surgeries, including numerous spine procedures. This study aimed to quantify the impact that COVID-19 had on the number of treated spinal conditions and diagnoses during the pandemic. METHODS: Using CPT and ICD-10 codes, TriNetX, a national database, was utilized to quantify spine procedures and diagnoses in patients >18 years of age. The period of March 2020-May 2021 was compared to a reference pre-pandemic period of March 2018-May 2019. Each time period was then stratified into four seasons of the year, and the mean average number of procedures per healthcare organization was compared. RESULTS: In total, 524,394 patient encounters from 53 healthcare organizations were included in the analysis. There were significant decreases in spine procedures and diagnoses during March-May 2020 compared to pre-pandemic levels. Measurable differences were noted for spine procedures during the winter of 2020-2021, including a decrease in lumbar laminectomy and anterior cervical arthrodesis. Comparing the pandemic period to the pre-pandemic period showed significant reductions in most spine procedures and treated diagnoses; however, there was an increase in open repair of thoracic fractures during this period. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 resulted in a widespread decrease in spinal diagnosis and treated conditions. An inverse relationship was observed between new COVID-19 cases and spine procedural volume. Recent increases in procedural volume from pre-pandemic levels are promising signs that the spine surgery community has narrowed the gap in unmet care produced by the pandemic.

Race Is Associated With Risk of Salvage Procedures and Postoperative Complications After Hip Procedures in Children With Cerebral Palsy.

BACKGROUND: Despite the many surgical interventions available for spastic hip dysplasia in children with cerebral palsy, a radical salvage hip procedure may still ultimately be required. The purpose of this study was to assess whether race is an independent risk factor for patients with cerebral palsy to undergo a salvage hip procedure or experience postoperative complications for hip dysplasia treatment. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Pediatric database from 2012 to 2019. International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions, Clinical Modifications (ICD-9-CM, ICD-10-CM), and current procedural terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify patients with cerebral palsy undergoing hip procedures for hip dysplasia and to stratify patients into salvage or reconstructive surgeries. RESULTS: There was a total of 3906 patients with cerebral palsy between the ages of 2 and 18 years undergoing a procedure for hip dysplasia, including 1995 (51.1%) White patients, 768 (19.7%) Black patients, and 1143 (29.3%) patients from other races. Both Black ( P =0.044) and White ( P =0.046) races were significantly associated with undergoing a salvage versus a reconstructive hip procedure, with Black patients having an increased risk compared to White patients [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.77, confidence interval (CI) 1.02-3.07]. Only Black patients were found to have an increased risk of any postoperative complication compared to White patients, with an adjusted OR of 1.26 (CI 1.02-1.56; P =0.033). Both White ( P =0.017) and black ( P =0.004) races were found to be significantly associated with medical complications, with Black patients having an increased risk (adjusted OR 1.43, CI 1.12-1.84) compared to White patients. There were no significant findings between the race and risk of surgical site complications, unplanned readmissions, or reoperations. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that patient race is an independent association for the risk of pediatric patients with cerebral palsy to both undergo a salvage hip procedure and to experience postoperative medical complications, with Black patients having an increased risk compared to White. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Retrospective Cohort Study.

The Evolving Role of Social Media in Pediatric Orthopaedics.

BACKGROUND: Social media has grown significantly and its application in health care has been dramatically accentuated by the COVID-19 pandemic. It is often considered as a "new dimension" of health care, particularly in its ability to provide health information. In 2017, the top social media sites utilized by pediatric orthopaedic surgeons included Facebook, LinkedIn, and Twitter. In our study, we analyze the current social media usage, trends in Instagram and TikTok content, and the perceptions on social media usage among pediatric orthopaedic surgeons. METHODS: The Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) membership directory was searched for the presence of social media. A review of all Instagram and TikTok posts made by the POSNA members were reviewed. A survey regarding the perception of social media networks and content was distributed to all POSNA members. RESULTS: A total of 1231 POSNA members actively practicing in the United States were included in our study. In all, 327 (26.6%) had a LinkedIn profile, 34 (2.8%) had a professional Facebook profile, 15 (1.2%) had a public Instagram account, 0 (0%) had TikTok, and 72 (5.8%) had a professional Twitter account. Fifteen POSNA members with public Instagram accounts had 10,878 followers. A total of 907 Instagram posts were made, 134 (14.8%) of which were education and 462 (50.9%) of which were personal or political. The perception of various social media networks such as Instagram (3.02), Facebook (3.16), and LinkedIn (3.51) were positive on a 5-point Likert scale, while perceptions of TikTok (2.36) and Twitter (2.99) were negative. Educational posts on Instagram (3.19) and Facebook (3.37) were positive. CONCLUSIONS: We provide an update to the utilization of social media by pediatric orthopaedists. Use of Instagram and TikTok accounts remain rare. Educational posts, when hosted on an appropriate social media platform, are perceived positively among pediatric orthopaedists. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Utility of Social Media for Recruitment by Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs.

BACKGROUND: As the use of social media continues to rise, the presence of social media accounts among orthopaedic surgery residency programs can foster connections with other specialties, highlight departmental achievements, and be a resource for applicants to learn more about the program. This study evaluated the current utility and landscape of social media, with an emphasis on the use of Instagram, in orthopaedic surgery residency programs in the United States. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of orthopaedic surgery residency Instagram accounts was performed. The Instagram accounts were evaluated for the number of followers, number of accounts following, and number of posts. Instagram posts were further categorized into academic, departmental, education, and COVID-19-related content. In addition, a search was performed to identify the presence of Twitter and Facebook accounts among orthopaedic surgery residency programs. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyze the data in this study. RESULTS: Of the 192 orthopaedic surgery residency programs evaluated, 108 programs (56%) had an Instagram account, 65 programs (34%) had a Twitter account, and 58 programs (30%) had a Facebook account. Of the 108 programs with an Instagram account, 92 accounts (85%) were created in 2020. A higher Doximity ranking of a program was positively associated with the presence of an Instagram account (p < 0.001). A significant correlation was found between the number of posts and the Instagram engagement score (p = 0.018). The majority of Instagram posts contained departmental content (54%) followed by social (13%) and COVID-19-related (10%) content. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of orthopaedic surgery residency programs on social media has grown significantly in the year 2020. With the presence of more than 50% of residency programs on Instagram, this can be a useful resource for prospective applicants and other healthcare professionals to gain insight into the activities of orthopaedic surgery residency programs across the United States.

Biomechanical comparison of standard iliosacral screw fixation to transsacral locked screw fixation in a type C zone II pelvic fracture model.

OBJECTIVES: Iliosacral screw fixation into the first sacral body is a common method for pelvic ring fixation. However, this construct has been shown to be clinically unreliable for the percutaneous fixation of unstable Type C zone II vertically oriented sacral fractures with residual fracture site separation. The objective of this study was to biomechanically compare a locked transsacral construct versus the standard iliosacral construct in a Type C zone II sacral fracture model. METHODS: A Type C pelvic ring injury was created in ten embalmed cadaver pelves by performing vertical osteotomies through zone II of the sacrum and the ipsilateral pubic rami. The sacrum was then reduced maintaining a 2 mm fracture gap. Five specimens were fixed using two 7.0-mm iliosacral screws into the S1 body; the other 5 were fixed using one 7.0-mm iliosacral screw and one 7.0-mm transsacral screw exiting the contralateral ilium with a nut placed on its end, creating a locked construct. Each pelvis underwent 100,000 cycles at 250 N and was then loaded to failure using a unilateral stance testing model. Vertical displacements at 25,000; 50,000; 75,000 and 100,000 cycles and failure force were recorded for each pelvis. RESULTS: The locked transsacral construct performed significantly better than the iliosacral construct at all 4 measurement points (P = 0.009) and in force to failure (P value = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Fixation of unstable zone II sacral fractures using the combination of an iliosacral screw and a locked transsacral screw resists deformation and withstands a greater force to failure as compared to fixation with 2 standard iliosacral screws. This locked transsacral construct may prove advantageous, especially when a percutaneous technique is used for a Type C zone II vertically oriented sacral fracture injury pattern, which can result in residual fracture site separation.

Sequential duplex ultrasound screening for proximal deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic patients with acetabular and pelvic fractures treated operatively.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence-based practice guidelines recommend against routine ultrasound screening for proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in asymptomatic pelvic fracture patients. However, the majority of trauma surgeons favor this practice. Furthermore, the timing of screening has been inconsistently described. The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of sequential scans in asymptomatic acetabular and pelvic fracture patients treated operatively. METHODS: In 2003, a screening protocol for DVT was begun for asymptomatic patients with these fractures treated operatively. Duplex ultrasound screening was used to evaluate the lower extremities for proximal DVT. Scans were to be obtained preoperatively and then postoperatively on the day before planned discharge from the hospital. A DVT prophylaxis protocol was also instituted. Between 2003 and 2007, 343 patients were identified for study. Patients were followed for thromboembolic complications for a minimum of 3 months. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-nine patients received both preoperative and postoperative scans. Of these, 35 patients (15%) had an asymptomatic DVT: 16 (7%) preoperatively and 19 (8%) postoperatively. Two patients (1%) with negative scans had a postoperative symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosed the day after surgery, but fatal PE did not occur. In the remaining 114 patients, 27 received a prophylactic inferior vena cava filter, 6 had a preoperative symptomatic DVT or PE before scanning, 25 received only the postoperative scan (3 being positive), and 56 were not scanned postoperatively. Of the 56 not scanned postoperatively, 2 (4%) were readmitted with a symptomatic proximal DVT but none for PE, and a fatal PE did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the possible diagnostic utility of sequential duplex ultrasound screening, it does not decrease the risk of PE in acetabular and pelvic fracture patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Statin therapy in heart failure: prognostic effects and potential mechanisms.

The use of statins as therapy for heart failure remains controversial. Nevertheless, many of the pleiotropic effects of statins are potentially applicable in heart failure. Although early statin trials excluded patients with heart failure because of concerns that lowering serum cholesterol could worsen an already poor prognosis, statin treatment has not been shown to have adverse effects on either cardiovascular events or mortality, and recent experimental and clinical studies have shown promise of benefit. Two large, ongoing trials should provide definitive evidence of the value of statin therapy for patients with heart failure. Pending those results, it is reasonable to follow current National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines in this high-risk population.